Roland sh-201

 
RemoteViewing81
User
Avatar
Gender: n/a
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1718
Registered: 02 / 2007
Subject:

Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 16.02.2008 - 08:54  ·  #1
dronescape
User
Avatar
Gender:
Location: Bobbejaanland, hèt lekkerste land!
Age: 52
Homepage: doombientmusic.ban…
Posts: 4695
Registered: 02 / 2007
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 16.02.2008 - 09:54  ·  #2
It
Guestuser
 
Avatar
 
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 16.02.2008 - 12:26  ·  #3
Most of the VA machines have inferior building quality. Only Access/Clavia is good.
pjtmusic
User
Avatar
Gender: n/a
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 860
Registered: 05 / 2007
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 16.02.2008 - 13:13  ·  #4
I'd say go for the soft option.
dronescape
User
Avatar
Gender:
Location: Bobbejaanland, hèt lekkerste land!
Age: 52
Homepage: doombientmusic.ban…
Posts: 4695
Registered: 02 / 2007
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 16.02.2008 - 22:43  ·  #5
Or for an Alesis Ion. I found this one rather pleasant.

Stephen
Vietgrove
User
Avatar
Gender: n/a
Location: North-East England
Homepage: vietgrove.com
Posts: 215
Registered: 02 / 2007
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 20.02.2008 - 13:25  ·  #6
Joker
User
Avatar
Gender: n/a
Posts: 58
Registered: 11 / 2007
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 20.02.2008 - 19:11  ·  #7
the roland juno d is worth sampling as well for a starter synth, very user friendly
Bruce
User
Avatar
Gender: n/a
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 88
Registered: 09 / 2007
Subject:

Re: Roland sh-201

 · 
Posted: 20.02.2008 - 21:58  ·  #8
These low-end VAs and ROMplers simply aren't worth it IMHO. Poor build quality and sound quality that is no better than software. The SH-201 looks great until you actually play it, then you quickly see how cheap and flimsy it is.

It seems to me that the hardware manufacturers are lost in the current software world, much like every company that wasn't Yamaha was lost when the DX7 first came out. Now, as then, most of them have focused on either niche items or unremarkable synths that are made as cheaply as possible. Anyone remember those awful basic Korg synths like the Poly 800? Yuck.

At the prices that these cheap synths go for, software is a much better deal: your choice of DAW, plus plug-ins like Atmosphere, Korg Analog Collection, impOSCar, MiniMonsta, Oddity, etc. There's also heaps of free Windows VST plug-ins. Or a Mac plus Logic Studio, which comes with a pile of excellent internal instruments and effects, and you can expand it further from there.

If you've got the cash, go for hardware, but if you're just getting your feet wet and/or don't have a lot of cash, forget about the cheap stuff. Good software beats crappy hardware any day.
Selected quotes for multi-quoting:   0

Registered users in this topic

Currently no registered users in this section

The statistic shows who was online during the last 5 minutes. Updated every 90 seconds.