Quote by dlmorley
Did someone criticise the DX7 ??????
I always have to stand up for it. Well used it is an amazing synth that cuts through any mix. I tend to do pretty full mixes and a dx7 just sits so well if you need something to stand out whilst not being loud.
TX816 is the biggest bargain on the market these days. 128 note poly or 16 note poly with 8 "partials"
Normal service can resume
Well, not exactly criticise... I used my trusted DX7IIFD for many years, and it was a lot of fun to play with. Plenty of great sounds, and I agree with you that it really stands out in a mix, but I was never able to get a good bass from it. Sure there were bass sounds in it, but they all sounded rather hollow, and without bottom-end. In the 80's, when the DX7 was the synth-of-choice for 90% of the pop bands, it dictated the way people expected a "modern" synth to sound.
The mysterious sound snippets in this thread have that typical 80's DX bass that I never appreciated. I traded it in for an Alesis Quadrasynth (the first version with the "handle" on the back - brilliant machine), and never lost a minute of sleep over that.
For "penetrating" sounds I use a Clavia Nord Lead nowadays, and for warm sounds I have a AN1x (another good Yamaha synth). In my attic, I have a CS40-M, but it doesn't work anymore. It can be fixed (by a guy called Saint Eric or something, I must have his email address somewhere), but lack of funds (or, to be more precise: another set of priorities) keeps me from investigating that possibility. All I know is that the "custom chip" (which acts like a memory to save presets) is broken. That is really the Achilles-heel of the entire CS series, so I was told.
The DX7 was a groundbreaking synth, and I am proud to have owned one, but soundwise I have moved on.